John M. Crisp: Impeachment and the death of parody

John M. Crisp: Impeachment and the death of parody

  • 0
President Donald Trump arrives at the White House in Washington, D.C., on  September 26, 2019. (Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images/TNS) **FOR USE WITH THIS STORY ONLY**

President Donald Trump arrives at the White House in Washington, D.C., on September 26, 2019. (Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images/TNS) **FOR USE WITH THIS STORY ONLY**

Here's an excerpt from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff's opening statement on Sept. 26, the day the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, testified before the committee. Schiff is talking about the now-infamous Trump-Zelenskiy phone conversation of July 25. He begins with a short preamble: "Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the president communicates:

"We've been very good to your country, very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what? I don't hear much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you, though. And I'm gonna say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it, on this and on that. I'm gonna put you in touch with people, not just any people, I'm gonna put you in touch with attorney general of the United States, my attorney, Bill Barr. He's got the whole weight of the American law enforcement behind him. And I'm gonna put you in touch with Rudy, you're gonna love him, trust me. You know what I'm asking, so I'm only gonna say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And by the way, don't call me again, I'll call you when you've done what I asked."

Republicans on the intelligence committee virtually plotzed with indignation. How dare Schiff "make things up," as one put it. Nothing but "fiction," another sniffed.

As a former English teacher, I mourn the death of parody in our age. There was nothing mysterious or nefarious about what Schiff was doing. He wasn't producing fiction or pretending that President Donald Trump actually said the words in question. Parody is a time-honored artistic device that puts an intentional, usually exaggerated, imitation of another work of literature, music, art or film to another purpose.

Usually that other purpose is comedy, though there's nothing funny about the transcript's original statements or Schiff's parody of them. But parody can also be used for commentary and instruction. It's another way of telling the truth, at least as the parodist sees it.

Why did Schiff feel that it was necessary to parody the reconstructed transcript of the phone call? Because Republicans were looking at the same transcript and ignoring the context of the favor that Trump was asking of Zelenskiy. They claim that the phone call conveyed no pressure, no demands, no quid quo pro. They refuse to take into account the life-and-death necessity that the withheld military aid represents for Ukraine.

Zelenskiy may have said there was no "pressure," but the pressure is baked into the context of the phone call. Schiff's parody was an effort to highlight the obvious arm-twisting that was taking place.

I doubt seriously that the Republicans on the intelligence committee are as ill-educated as they pretend to be. I suspect that they recognized Schiff's real intentions as immediately as I did. Their overwrought responses were disingenuous and easily dismissible. In fact, in the midst of everything else going on, I did not think this minor incident was worth writing about, at all.

The problem is, Trump just cannot let go of Schiff's modest attempt at the art of parody. Schiff has become a focus of Trump's wrath. Here's one tweet among others:

"Rep. Adam Schiff illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement, pretended it to be mine as the most important part of my call to the Ukrainian President, and read it aloud to Congress and the American people. It bore NO relationship to what I said on the call. Arrest for Treason?"

Treason? For parody? In Trump's mind, this association led directly to another suggestion, which he made publicly, without evidence: the idea that Schiff actually helped the whistleblower write the complaint.

Which shows that as long as Trump is in office, parody may be imperiled, but we do not have to worry about the survival of another time-honored literary genre: fantasy.


ABOUT THE WRITERJohn M. Crisp, an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service, lives in Georgetown, Texas, and can be reached at


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

The Fourth Amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." But the Supreme Court has interpreted that protection pretty loosely when it comes to traffic stops, for which the police need only "reasonable suspicion" that the law is or has been broken. (The same indulgent standard applies when police stop and frisk a pedestrian.) Last week the justices heard arguments in a case that ...

President Trump has offered multiple lines of defense against House Democrats' allegations that he appeared to abuse the power of his office in his dealings with Ukraine's new government. Some are situational and temporary, such as his argument that the process was illegitimate because it hadn't been authorized by a vote of the full House (which it now has been). But one that we are likely to ...

When I crossed through Checkpoint Charlie from West Berlin to East Berlin nearly 30 years ago, the failures of former East Germany were immediately obvious. The grey unkempt landscape and dilapidated buildings looked as though that country hadn't been repaired since American and Soviet tanks faced off yards apart decades earlier in one of the most tense nuclear showdowns. While there, I ...

  • Updated

Even before his ill-advised mockery of President Trump's request for "a favor" from new Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) was seen by Republicans as blinded by bias against Trump. And now that Schiff is leading the initial phase of the House impeachment inquiry, he has become Exhibit A in the GOP argument that the whole thing ...

It's an all but foregone conclusion that the House of Representatives will impeach Donald Trump, and it is almost as certain that the Senate will not convict him. For those convinced of the president's venality, the latter prospect makes it imperative that the formal indictment in the House - the articles of impeachment - be detailed and all-encompassing. The articles' content, the exact way ...

Republicans have been engaging in some interesting contortions in conjuring a defense for President Donald Trump's attempt to get Ukrainian officials to investigate the family of political rival Joe Biden. The most plausible approach is one Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey signed on to last month, saying that he is keeping an open mind but that even if Trump asked Ukraine for a favor, the offense ...

A quiet Friday before the long Veterans Day weekend was apparently as good a time as any for the Trump administration to unveil its latest assault on immigrants: rules changes designed to deter those legally here from acquiring their rightly earned citizenship. The proposed new rules direct United States Citizenship and Immigrant Services, or USCIS - the arm of our immigration system that is ...

Thirty years ago, the fall of the Berlin Wall signaled the end of the Cold War. Where there had been two superpowers locked in a dangerous decades-long post-World War II rivalry, only one remained. A global order commonly but misleadingly referred to as bipolar gave way to a new era even more misleadingly referred to as unipolar. The onset of this unipolar order induced in Washington a mood of ...

Left without remedy, an injustice does not heal. It compounds. This is the fundamental principle behind a 2006 lawsuit filed by a coalition concerned for Maryland's four historically black colleges and universities: Morgan State University, Coppin State University, Bowie State University and the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore. It alleges that the state funded largely white institutions ...

Recently, a group of civil rights advocates and the Compton Unified School District threatened to sue the University of California if the system did not eliminate the SAT and ACT in admissions requirements. The groups charge that the tests discriminate against underrepresented minority students, as well as low-income and disabled applicants. My son just took the PSAT along with more than 4 ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News