Commentary: Lindsey Graham is setting up his own Rudy Giuliani sideshow

Commentary: Lindsey Graham is setting up his own Rudy Giuliani sideshow

  • 0
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) speaks at a hearing on immigration, on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C., on June 11, 2019.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) speaks at a hearing on immigration, on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C., on June 11, 2019. (Stefani Reynolds/CNP/Zuma Press/TNS)

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who's been hard at work pursuing the dark forces behind the FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign, announced Tuesday on Twitter that he wants to open another investigation that will warm the cockles of President Trump's heart: the firing of former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

And his main witness? Trump's personal attorney, former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani.

On the surface, this looks ridiculous. Giuliani, who is not known for his rigorous adherence to real-world facts, has been gathering information from sketchy Ukrainian sources to advance the theory that former Vice President Joe Biden forced the Ukrainian parliament to fire Shokin to cut short an investigation into Burisma, an energy company that gave Biden's son Hunter a lucrative post on its board of directors in May 2014.

But that notion runs counter to reporting at the time - and now - about how Joe Biden joined a chorus of international diplomats pushing Ukraine to get tougher on corruption, including the alleged misdeeds of Burisma's majority shareholder, Mykola Zlochevskiy. Notably, U.S. and British authorities complained that a lack of cooperation from Ukrainian prosecutors undermined a British investigation of alleged fraud by Zlochevskiy. Giuliani appears to be painting a through-the-looking-glass picture of events where Biden, not Shokin, is the one covering for corruption, and Giuliani and Trump are the exposers.

Nevertheless, Graham wants to hold a hearing on "corruption and other improprieties" in Ukraine at some to-be-determined date with one witness - Giuliani - and then go from there.

So far, Graham hasn't laid out a path to giving voice to "everything Ukraine." He's giving a voice to Giuliani and his warped view of events, which seems rooted in a peculiar sort of political unified field theory - namely, that forces in Ukraine sought to elect Hillary Clinton and funnel U.S. tax dollars somehow to Hunter Biden, magically tying together the presidential campaigns of 2016 and 2020.

The only thing that prevents rational people from dismissing all this stuff as crazy talk fueled by discredited Ukrainian ex-officials is Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma, which carries the whiff of a powerful politician's son trading on his family name.

This is foul air badly in need of clearing. And if Graham is really interested in getting to the bottom of it, great - we would all be better off working from a common set of facts.

I'm not confident that Graham is so motivated; his main concern seems to be how the House is treating Trump. (Graham tweeted Monday night that the House was "destroying" the Constitution by not allowing Trump and his lawyers to confront the anonymous whistleblower who triggered the impeachment inquiry.) But at the very least, bringing Giuliani before the full committee would give multiple senators the chance to hold Giuliani's allegations up to the light, vetting the quality of the evidence he presents and identifying other witnesses whose testimony should be compelled.

Graham's announcement on Twitter about inviting Giuliani to testify took the Democrats on his committee by surprise, but they warmed to the idea quickly. "I welcome the opportunity to question Rudy Giuliani under oath about his role in seeking the Ukrainian government's assistance to investigate one of the president's political rivals," the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, said in a statement. She added, "Democratic members have plenty of questions for Mr. Giuliani and this would give us an opportunity to help separate fact from fiction for the American people."



Jon Healey is the deputy editorial page editor for the Los Angeles Times.

Visit the Los Angeles Times at


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

The Fourth Amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." But the Supreme Court has interpreted that protection pretty loosely when it comes to traffic stops, for which the police need only "reasonable suspicion" that the law is or has been broken. (The same indulgent standard applies when police stop and frisk a pedestrian.) Last week the justices heard arguments in a case that ...

President Trump has offered multiple lines of defense against House Democrats' allegations that he appeared to abuse the power of his office in his dealings with Ukraine's new government. Some are situational and temporary, such as his argument that the process was illegitimate because it hadn't been authorized by a vote of the full House (which it now has been). But one that we are likely to ...

When I crossed through Checkpoint Charlie from West Berlin to East Berlin nearly 30 years ago, the failures of former East Germany were immediately obvious. The grey unkempt landscape and dilapidated buildings looked as though that country hadn't been repaired since American and Soviet tanks faced off yards apart decades earlier in one of the most tense nuclear showdowns. While there, I ...

  • Updated

Even before his ill-advised mockery of President Trump's request for "a favor" from new Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) was seen by Republicans as blinded by bias against Trump. And now that Schiff is leading the initial phase of the House impeachment inquiry, he has become Exhibit A in the GOP argument that the whole thing ...

It's an all but foregone conclusion that the House of Representatives will impeach Donald Trump, and it is almost as certain that the Senate will not convict him. For those convinced of the president's venality, the latter prospect makes it imperative that the formal indictment in the House - the articles of impeachment - be detailed and all-encompassing. The articles' content, the exact way ...

Republicans have been engaging in some interesting contortions in conjuring a defense for President Donald Trump's attempt to get Ukrainian officials to investigate the family of political rival Joe Biden. The most plausible approach is one Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey signed on to last month, saying that he is keeping an open mind but that even if Trump asked Ukraine for a favor, the offense ...

Left without remedy, an injustice does not heal. It compounds. This is the fundamental principle behind a 2006 lawsuit filed by a coalition concerned for Maryland's four historically black colleges and universities: Morgan State University, Coppin State University, Bowie State University and the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore. It alleges that the state funded largely white institutions ...

Thirty years ago, the fall of the Berlin Wall signaled the end of the Cold War. Where there had been two superpowers locked in a dangerous decades-long post-World War II rivalry, only one remained. A global order commonly but misleadingly referred to as bipolar gave way to a new era even more misleadingly referred to as unipolar. The onset of this unipolar order induced in Washington a mood of ...

A quiet Friday before the long Veterans Day weekend was apparently as good a time as any for the Trump administration to unveil its latest assault on immigrants: rules changes designed to deter those legally here from acquiring their rightly earned citizenship. The proposed new rules direct United States Citizenship and Immigrant Services, or USCIS - the arm of our immigration system that is ...

Recently, a group of civil rights advocates and the Compton Unified School District threatened to sue the University of California if the system did not eliminate the SAT and ACT in admissions requirements. The groups charge that the tests discriminate against underrepresented minority students, as well as low-income and disabled applicants. My son just took the PSAT along with more than 4 ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alert

Breaking News