Fed Lunch Program

Waterford school districts drop federal lunch program

Will serve what they want rather than mandated meals
2014-03-24T06:37:00Z 2014-03-27T07:01:51Z Waterford school districts drop federal lunch programLINDSAY BULLOCK lindsay.bullock@journaltimes.com Journal Times

WATERFORD — New federal requirements that foods sold in schools be healthier have some area school districts opting out of the federal lunch program that provides subsidies for serving free or reduced-price meals to low-income students.

Opting out means the districts do not have to follow food healthiness requirements. But it also means the districts lose federal money that covers the cost of free and reduced-price meals for poorer students.

The Waterford Graded and Waterford High School districts have weighed their options and decided they’d rather forego the money and serve what they want. They’ll continue to cover the costs of low-income students’ meals — likely by spending less on fruits and vegetables that students simply throw away, and by serving slightly less healthy but overall tastier meals to increase lunch participation among paying students, officials from those districts said.

Advertisement: Story Continues Below

Leaving the program

Waterford Graded’s School Board unanimously voted in January to leave the National School Lunch Program for the coming 2014-15 school year, when the new food healthiness requirements will be in effect, said District Administrator Chris Joch.

The Waterford High School Board unanimously made the same decision on Wednesday, said Superintendent Keith Brandstetter.

Advertisement: Story Continues Below

The National School Lunch Program previously required participating schools make lunches healthier by doing things like serving more fruit and a greater variety of vegetables; offering only low- or non-fat milk; and eliminating trans fat. Further requirements for the 2014-15 school year will limit sodium and require all grains be “whole-grain rich,” according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Additional changes that take effect in July will apply similar requirements to other food sold at schools during the school day, like items in the a la carte lunch line or in vending machines, according to the USDA.

Those changes would be especially problematic for Waterford High School. A coffee shop run by special education students would likely have to close given the calories and sugars in specialty coffee drinks, Brandstetter said. The school’s a la carte revenue would also likely decline, according to Taher, the high school’s food service vendor.

And, when it comes to the meals themselves, the requirements “just restrict us a little too much,” Brandstetter said. Students have complained about taste, portions are not big enough for athletes and dollars get wasted on fruits and vegetables that students must take but often throw away, he said.

At lunch Thursday, students echoed Brandstetter’s comments.

“The taste has gotten a lot worse and the portions have gotten a lot smaller,” said junior D.J. McGilvary. “The pizza my freshman year tasted good, and now it tastes like cardboard. And nachos — there’s a lot less chips than there used to be.”

Junior Austin Mealy said the school lunches leave him hungry in the afternoon at track practice.

“Most of us are athletes and we need more food,” he said.

Similar concerns about the food were part of Waterford Graded’s decision. Plus, “the prevailing sentiment among the board members (was) that the federal government’s having too much influence or control in that area of school programming,” Joch said.

Without the federal program, Waterford students’ meals will still be healthy, Joch and Brandstetter said.

“It’s not like we’re serving them pure sugar,” Brandstetter said. “It’s probably no different than you’re serving your kid at home.”

Making up federal dollars

Waterford High School has 14 percent of its students getting free or reduced-price meals. Without federal dollars paying for those meals, the school will have to come up with about $53,000 each year. That’s roughly 10 percent of the approximately $518,000 it spends on food service annually; money from paying students makes up the rest of that amount, Brandstetter said.

He hopes to recoup those federal dollars and keep his food service budget balanced by spending less on garbage-bound fruits and vegetables, and by making meals — and a la carte items — tastier so more kids buy them.

“The rationale is there’s going to be less waste and they can serve a better product and they can sell more, which will increase profit and will offset some of the other losses,” Brandstetter said.

In Waterford Graded, 19 percent of students get free or reduced-price meals, Joch said. The amount of federal money received for those meals and the total cost of the district’s food service program were not available Friday.

The district has asked food service vendors to include deficit abatement plans when applying to work with its schools. Like Brandstetter, Joch also hopes better food will lead to more buyers. But, he added, dollars in the district’s general fund could be used to offset losses if necessary.

Other Racine County districts may follow the two in Waterford. The Dover School District Board, for example, has been talking about leaving the National School Lunch Program because of concerns about the new regulations and resulting food quality, said District Administrator Matt Stratton.

Copyright 2015 Journal Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. galloping gramma
    Report Abuse
    galloping gramma - March 25, 2014 4:50 pm
    I would like to follow up on this story. How can I get direct contact with the "powers that be" ? I would like to have the real scoop to share with those in my state. Good luck, Waterford!!!!
  2. MCP
    Report Abuse
    MCP - March 25, 2014 6:44 am
    Back in the 80s we had great food for the most part, it was somewhat balanced, and no soda. The only time I'd put on weight is during the summer if I ate too much junk food and wasn't participating in sports. Point is school isn't going to make you fat, bad habits outside of school are. Students work hard, often play sports, and deserve good food options. This isn't prison for god sake. Another fine example of how the govt doesn't get it.
  3. snowfeather
    Report Abuse
    snowfeather - March 24, 2014 10:09 pm
    Kudos WUHS! Peanut butter and Jelly never killed us when my parents had difficult times. Nor did boloney sandwiches, or left over meatloaf! A bag of corn chips cost 1.00 at Aldi and makes five generous servings in put into plastic baggies or reusable containers, a bag of apples are under 3.00. Many children who are get "free lunches" parents already get food stamps... and IMHO they can brown bag it for their kids, just as others who don't get any subsidies but are having difficult times as well. The ONLY thing I do not believe should be sold on school premises is soda, not sure if it is but it was at one time. (@Ponybobhaslam...HUH? What are you ranting about? The article is about LUNCHES not teachers or unions and crooks? But I'm guessing you would have a change of heart if you were a union teacher putting up w/ disrespectful kids and uncaring parents or worse helicopter parents who rather "b" than sit at the table and help their kids with their home work!)
  4. myabcs
    Report Abuse
    myabcs - March 24, 2014 3:30 pm
    I HATE the "homemade" vs. heat & eat suggestion, homemade is white flour & refined sugar the worst things you can possibly put in your body. We shove fruit & veggies down their throats until the culture changes culture changes take time. The upcoming generation of entitled HS age students doesn't exactly help matters, they think they run the world and should get patted on the back for it
  5. galloping gramma
    Report Abuse
    galloping gramma - March 24, 2014 11:04 am
    To those who think it won't work, let me tell you: when I was foodservice manager we were in the black every year. We got a director and she proceeded to zilch things that I had on the menu, and "my kids" were not happy!! I made things from scratch, she bought it ready to heat and eat. I limited, not cut off, some things that were not as healthy, but compensated by serving smaller portions, along with a food that made up the requirement. We had a 97-98 percent participation. The kids were happier then, not now. "myabcs" listen to your parents and students and pay attention!!!!
  6. galloping gramma
    Report Abuse
    galloping gramma - March 24, 2014 10:58 am
    I am so anxious to see how this works. I am retired (1997) and have felt the government has gone too far. I hear this from the current food service personnel all the time. One comment was, "We used to get two garbage cans of garbage, but now we have three." Good Luck, Waterford. I wish I lived closer so I could come see for myself!!!
  7. Ponybobhaslam
    Report Abuse
    Ponybobhaslam - March 24, 2014 10:36 am
    HMMMMMM!! No mention (in the lib media) about the impact of the GOP ending the wholesale rape of the school districts by the worthless teacher union thugs!!!! I'm shocked. Without Walker ending the union thievery in wages, pensions and medical insurance frauds, n district would be able to do what waterford is doing. God bless walker....Taking tax money from union crooks and spending it on the kids! What a novel idea. 4, o 8, or 12... More years....
  8. myabcs
    Report Abuse
    myabcs - March 24, 2014 9:40 am
    Seems like a slippery slope to letting the "inmates run the asylum" Obviously kids want to eat junk, isn't it our job as adults to teach and redirect them to healthy choices, not just reject the federal government and service fries and large portions of nachos??
  9. layedback
    Report Abuse
    layedback - March 24, 2014 8:18 am
    Could never do that here. Over 50% receive free or reduced lunch.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick